| 曹伟,魏光辉,卢震林.新疆塔里木盆地北缘日参考作物腾发量计算模型评价[J].干旱地区农业研究,2013,31(4):61~65 |
| 新疆塔里木盆地北缘日参考作物腾发量计算模型评价 |
| Evaluation of calculation models for daily reference crop evapotranspiration in north Tarim Basin |
| |
| DOI：10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2013.04.012 |
| 中文关键词: 参考作物腾发量 Penman-Monteith FAO56 干旱区 塔里木盆地 |
| 英文关键词:reference crop evapotranspiration Penman-Monteith FAO 56 arid areas Tarim Basin |
| 基金项目:绿洲灌区节水安全关键技术研究与示范(201130103-3)；水利部公益性项目“塔河流域水量分配关键技术研究”(201101049) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1542 |
| 全文下载次数: 1222 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 采用4种常用的腾发量模型(Makkink模型,Turc模型,Priestley-Taylor模型以及Hargreaves模型)计算日腾发量,并以Penman-Monteith FAO 56公式计算结果为标准值进行对比,旨在寻找出建模数据少、模拟精度高以及适合研究区的腾发量计算模型。结果表明:Turc模型的日参考作物蒸发蒸腾量与Penman-Monteith FAO 56差异较小,其次是Makkink模型与Priestley-Taylor模型,Hargreaves模型的差异最大。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| By using the calculation results of Penman-Monteith FAO 56 as standard values, four models including Makkink model, Turc model, Priestley-Taylor model and Hargreaves model, which were commonly used to estimate daily reference crop evapotranspiration values, were evaluated to determine the suitable model for estimating ET0 with few data requirements and high accuracy for north Tarim Basin. The results showed that Turc model was the best model in estimating ET0, followed by Makkink model and Priestley-Taylor model, but Hargreaves model turned out to be the most imprecise model in the study area. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| | |