| 范志伟,吴开贤,安曈昕,杨圆满,周锋,吴伯志.玉米马铃薯间作群体的蒸腾量和蒸腾效率研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2016,34(5):129~137 |
| 玉米马铃薯间作群体的蒸腾量和蒸腾效率研究 |
| Study on transpiration and transpiration efficiency of intercropped maize and potato population |
| |
| DOI：10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2016.05.20 |
| 中文关键词: 间作；玉米；马铃薯 蒸腾量；蒸腾效率 |
| 英文关键词:intercropping transpiration transpiration efficiency Maize Potato |
| 基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(2011CB100402)；国家教育部博士点专项基金(20125302110001) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1583 |
| 全文下载次数: 1017 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 以玉米（Zea mays L.）和马铃薯（Solanum tuberosum L.）间作为研究对象，结合大田和盆栽试验，通过观测土壤蒸发、土壤含水量和作物蒸腾量，分析作物的水分竞争能力和间作的产量优势，研究间作对作物水分利用的影响特征与机理。大田试验结果表明：① 玉米与马铃薯在同一时期的蒸腾量差异导致了两作物种植区域之间的土壤含水量差异；② 间作的蒸腾量4 424.07 t·hm-2显著大于单作玉米和单作马铃薯蒸腾量的加权平均值3 612.27 t·hm-2(P＜0.01)；③ 间作的土地当量比LER（land equivalent ratio）＞1(P＜0.01)，说明间作表现了增产优势。盆栽试验结果表明：① 玉米和马铃薯在同一时期的蒸腾量存在差异，这意味着两作物种植区域的土壤含水量也存在差异（盆栽试验已基本消除土壤蒸发，土壤含水量主要受作物蒸腾影响）；② 间作的蒸腾量51.79 kg·盆-1显著大于单作玉米和单作马铃薯蒸腾量的加权平均值48.36 kg·盆-1（P=0.011）；③ 作物的种间相对竞争力RC(Relative competitive abilty)＞1(P＜0.001)，说明玉米在种间水分竞争中占据优势地位；④ 玉米的蒸腾效率5.38 g·kg-1显著大于马铃薯的3.68 g·kg-1(P＜0.001）；⑤ 间作的蒸腾效率4.82 g·kg-1显著大于单作玉米和单作马铃薯蒸腾效率的加权平均值4.53 g·kg-1(P＜0.001）；⑥ 间作的土地当量比LER＞1（P=0.001），说明间作表现了增产优势。以上结果说明：玉米和马铃薯在同一时期的蒸腾量差异可以导致它们种植区域之间的土壤含水量差异，进而使得在间作中，一种作物可以利用另一种作物种植区域的较多土壤水分，所以间作可以提高作物群体蒸腾量；玉米既具有较高的蒸腾效率，又在种间水分竞争中占据优势地位，因此玉米马铃薯间作可以提高作物群体蒸腾效率；蒸腾量和蒸腾效率的协同提高是该间作表现增产优势的重要原因。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| It has been suggested that the over-yielding of intercropping is highly correlated to its efficient use of water resource. However, the efficiently water usage of intercropping has not been comprehensively studied from the aspect of transpiration (the major form of crop water usage). In this study, using intercropped maize (Zea mays L.) and potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) as the study object, we combined the field and pot experiments to observe the soil evaporation, soil moisture content and crop transpiration. We also analyzed the competitive ability of intercropped crops and the yield advantage of intercropping, and investigated the water usage feature and mechanism in intercropping. The field experiment result showed that the transpiration difference between maize and potato during the same period could lead to the soil moisture content difference. In addition, the transpiration in intercropping of 4 424.07 t·hm-2 was significantly higher than the weighted average of that in sole maize and sole potato of 3 612.27 t·hm-2 (P＜0.01). Futhermore, the land equivalent ratio (LER) of intercropping was>1, indicating that the intercropping had the yield advantage. The pot experiment result showed that the transpiration of maize and potato was different during the same period. Namely, the transpiration of maize was smaller than that of potato before the tuber initiation stage of potato and seedling stage of maize (P<0.05), and higher than that of potato after that period (P<0.05). Additionally, the transpiration in intercropping of 51.79 kg·pot-1 was significantly higher than the weighted average of that in sole maize and sole potato of 48.36 kg·pot-1 (P=0.011). Moreover, the relative competitive ability (RC) between the intercropped crops was>1, indicating that maize had water competitive advantage. Also, the transpiration efficiency of maize (5.38 g·kg-1) was significantly higher than that of potato (3.68 g·kg-1) (P<0.001). The transpiration efficiency in intercropping of 4.82 g·kg-1 was significantly higher than the weighted average of that in sole maize and sole potato of 3.68 g·kg-1 (P<0.001). The land equivalent ratio (LER) of intercropping was>1, indicating that the intercropping had the yield advantage. Overall, our results suggested that the transpiration of maize is different from that of potato during the same period. Thereby the intercropping can improve the crop transpiration. Maize has the higher transpiration efficiency than potato, and maize has the water competitive advantage in intercropping, allowing improvement of the crop transpiration efficiency. The improvement of both crop transpiration and transpiration efficiency in intercropping is an important reason for over-yielding in intercropping. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| | |