梁萍,张永清,张萌,高艳梅,王丹,严翻翻,合佳敏,王慧娟.不同盐碱胁迫条件下PAM施用深度对藜麦生长及产量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2023,(5):130~137
不同盐碱胁迫条件下PAM施用深度对藜麦生长及产量的影响
Effects of PAM application depth on the growth and yield of quinoa under different salt\|alkali stress
  
DOI:10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2023.05.14
中文关键词:  藜麦  盐碱胁迫  PAM  施用深度  生长  产量
英文关键词:quinoa  saline\|alkali stress  PAM  application depth  growth  yield
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(NSFC-31571604)
作者单位
梁萍 山西师范大学生命科学学院山西 太原 030000 
张永清 山西师范大学生命科学学院山西 太原 030000山西师范大学地理科学学院,山西 太原 030000 
张萌 山西师范大学生命科学学院山西 太原 030000 
高艳梅 山西师范大学生命科学学院山西 太原 030000 
王丹 山西师范大学生命科学学院山西 太原 030000 
严翻翻 山西师范大学生命科学学院山西 太原 030000 
合佳敏 山西师范大学生命科学学院山西 太原 030000 
王慧娟 山西师范大学生命科学学院山西 太原 030000 
摘要点击次数: 684
全文下载次数: 624
中文摘要:
      以‘陇藜4号’为试验材料,采用根管土柱栽培的方式,研究了不同程度盐碱胁迫(S1:轻度盐碱胁迫;S2:中度盐碱胁迫;S3:重度盐碱胁迫)条件下土壤调理剂PAM施用深度(PAM0-10:距地表0~10 cm;PAM10-20:距地表10~20 cm;PAM20-30:距地表20~30 cm;PAM0-30:距地表0~30 cm)对藜麦根系生长、叶片渗透调节物质含量、植株生物量及产量的影响。结果表明:在PAM施用深度为0~10 cm时,轻度盐胁迫处理藜麦的根长、生物量及产量指标较对照组(S0:不加入盐碱和PAM)分别高出35.71%、15.48%和4.60%,表明藜麦具有较强的耐盐能力。当盐碱胁迫增加到一定程度(S2和S3处理)时,藜麦的形态指标有显著下降趋势,与对照组处理相比重度盐胁迫藜麦的根长、生物量下降幅度最大,平均分别下降了53.72%和62.99%,但在同等重度盐碱胁迫程度时,PAM0-10处理能够缓解盐碱对藜麦生长产生的胁迫作用,与对照组相比藜麦的根长和生物量分别降低了39.31%和45.42%。综合各项指标,盐碱胁迫条件下不同PAM施用方式对藜麦各生长指标的影响均表现为表层集中施用(PAM0-10)处理的效果最佳(P<0.05)。隶属函数分析显示,不同处理对藜麦生长的缓解程度表现为:S1>S2>S3,PAM0-10> PAM0-30> PAM10-20> PAM20-30,说明在实际栽培过程中采用表层(0~10 cm)集中施用PAM的方式对盐碱胁迫下藜麦生长的缓解效果最为明显。
英文摘要:
      Taking Longli No.4 as the experimental material, the effects of soil conditioner PAM application depth (PAM0-10: 0~10 cm from the surface, PAM10-20: 10~20 cm from the surface, PAM20-30: 20~30 cm from the surface, PAM0-30: 0~30 cm from the surface ) on the root growth, leaf osmotic adjustment substance content, plant biomass and yield of quinoa under different degrees of saline\|alkali stress (S1: mild saline\|alkali stress, S2: moderate saline\|alkali stress, S3: severe saline\|alkali stress ) were studied by root canal soil column cultivation. The results showed that when the depth of PAM application was 0~10 cm, the root length, biomass and yield indexes of quinoa under mild salt stress were 35.71%, 15.48% and 4.60% higher than those of the control group (S0: no saline\|alkali and PAM), respectively, indicating that quinoa did have strong salt tolerance. When the saline\|alkali stress increased to a certain extent (S2 and S3 treatment), the morphological indexes of quinoa showed a significant downward trend. Compared with the control group, the root length and biomass of quinoa under severe saline\|alkali stress decreased the most, which decreased by 53.72% and 62.99% respectively. However, under the same degree of severe saline\|alkali stress, PAM0-10 treatment could alleviate the stress effect of saline\|alkali on the growth of quinoa. Compared with the control group, the root length and biomass indexes of quinoa decreased by 39.31% and 45.42%, respectively. Based on the comprehensive indexes, the effects of different PAM application methods on the growth indexes of quinoa under different saline\|alkali stress conditions showed that the effect of surface centralized application (PAM0-10) was the best (P<0.05). The membership function analysis showed that the growth of quinoa was alleviated under different treatment conditions as follows: S1>S2>S3, PAM0-10>PAM0-30>PAM10-20>PAM20-30, indicating that in the actual cultivation process, the method of concentrated application of PAM (0~10 cm) on the surface layer had the most obvious mitigation effect on the growth of quinoa under saline\|alkali stress.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器