| Effect of different mulching measures on soil enzyme and fluorescence characteristics of tobacco leaves |
|
View Fulltext View/Add Comment Download reader |
| |
| DOI：10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2011.01.36 |
| Key Words: plastic film mulching liquid film chlorophyll fluorescence parameter soil enzyme tobacco |
| Author Name | Affiliation | | XU Zicheng | College of Tobacco Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China | | WANG Xiaodong | College of Agronomy, Henna University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471003, China | | YANG Yile | Tobacco Corporation of Yichuan County, Yichuan, Henan 471300, China | | LIU Zhanqing | Tobacco Corporation of Yichuan County, Yichuan, Henan 471300, China |
|
| Hits: 402 |
| Download times: 292 |
| Abstract: |
| Comparison was made of effects of three different mulching ways applied to tobacco field experiment, and the results showed that mulching treatment enhanced obviously the activity of soil peroxidase and soil sucrase, while it restrained the activity of soil urease to a certain extent. As compared with contrast and plastic film mulching treatments, liquid film mulching improved significantly the activity of soil peroxidase, and the activity was increased by 5.72% and 23.19% respectively on the average at vigorous growing stage of tobacco, and the differences of two mulching treatments reached significant level (P>0.05). At the same time the activity of soil sucrase under mulching treatment increased by 0.8% in comparison with contrast treatment, but the differences of three treatments didn′t reach significant level (P>0.05). Tobacco leaves under Fv/F0 & Fv/Fm of mulching treatments were significantly larger than contrast treatment, and their differences reached significant level (P>0.05), while the effect distinction of chlorophyll fluorescence parameter was not significant under plastic film mulching and liquid film mulching, and their effect was equivalent. |
|
|
|