| Design and testing of key components in above-film transplanter |
|
View Fulltext View/Add Comment Download reader |
| |
| DOI：10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2013.01.42 |
| Key Words: above-film transplant transplanter key components design |
| Author Name | Affiliation | | LIU Yang | Machinery Equipment Research Institute, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China | | LI Yaxiong | Machinery Equipment Research Institute, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China | | LI Bin | Machinery Equipment Research Institute, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China | | WANG Tao | Machinery Equipment Research Institute, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China | | LU Yongtao | Machinery Equipment Research Institute, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China | | LI Fan | Machinery Equipment Research Institute, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China |
|
| Hits: 203 |
| Download times: 134 |
| Abstract: |
| Aimed at the development of film mulch and drip irrigation planting pattern for
tomato and capsicum in Xinjiang, an above-film transplanter was manufactured to
accomplish the accessorial feeding of seedlings, punching on film, transplantin
g, casing soil and other processes simultaneously. The key components, including
transplanting parts, intermittent seedling feeding device and soil casing devic
e, were designed, and a transplanting test of tomato seedlings was conducted wit
h this machine. The test results showed that the tranplanter could satisfy
well the agronomic requirements of punching on film and casing soil in crop tran
splanting, without seedling injury and film scratch. When the transplanting freq
uency of intermittent seedling feeding device was below 67 plants/(min·row), t
he accuracy of seedling feeding was high. The transplanted plant spacing was gre
ater than the designed plant spacing, which was mainly due to the thickness of l
oose surface soil and the friction within the various components of the machine.
When the transplanting frequency was 55～62 plants/(min·row), the pass rate of
transplanting was more than 92%. |
|
|
|