Effect of maize‖potato intercropping on topsoil moisture and yield benefits
View Fulltext  View/Add Comment  Download reader
  
DOI:10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2017.06.11
Key Words: maize and potato intercropping  drought resistance cultivation  soil moisture  yield and benefit
Author NameAffiliation
AN Tong-xin Faculty of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China 
CHEN Meng-li Agricultural Technology Promotion Station of Tonghai County, Yuxi, Yunnan 652700, China 
GAO Lian-zhang Bureau of Agricultural Technology Promotion Center of Xuanwei, Qujing, Yunnan 650201, China 
LU Jing Faculty of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China 
ZHOU Feng Faculty of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China 
WU Bo-zhi Faculty of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China 
ZHANG Lian-gen Faculty of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China 
Hits: 1216
Download times: 741
Abstract:
      The field experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of maize‖potato intercropping on drought resistance in the Agricultural Technology Demonstration Base of Xuanwei city in 2014. The treatments include: T1, maize + ditching + polythene mulch intercropping with potato; T2, maize + pitting + polythene mulch intercropping with potato; T3, maize + polythene mulch intercropping with potato; T4, maize monoculture with polythene; T5, potato monoculture. The results showed that mean soil moisture of treatment T1 and T2 in maize field were higher than that of treatment T4, as increased by 28.32% in 0~7.6 cm soil layer and 28.12% in 0~20 cm soil layer respectively. Soil moisture of treatment T1 and T2 in potato field were increased by 23.52% in 0~7.6 cm soil layer and 12.78% in 0~20 cm soil layer compared with treatment T5. Treatment T1 and T2 significantly increased the yield of maize and land equivalent ratio(LER) than treatment T3, the LER of T2(LER=1.20) was 10.52% higher than T3.